SAQA stands for the South African Qualifications Authority. It was instituted by the SAQA Act, Act No. 58 of 1995 and is intended to supervise the setting up of the National Qualifications Framework (NQF). SAQA has the human resources to set up the NQF, which is just a database
Compiled by Professor W R Kilfoil(1)
NOTE: Items marked with an asterisk have expanded explanations in an addendum at the end.
A
Accreditation
The procedure by which an authoritative body gives formal recognition that an institute, body or person is competent in terms of a specific purpose. The Council on Higher Education (CHE) accredits universities to offer certain qualifications. The universities accredit student achievement of the outcomes of these qualifications.
Applied competence
'... the ability to put into practice in the relevant context the learning outcomes acquired in obtaining a qualification' (SAQA Regulations, March 1998). It is a combination of three types of competence:
- practical: knowing how to do things, ability to make decisions
- fundamental: understanding what you are doing and why
- reflective/ reflexive: learn and adapt through self-reflection; apply knowledge appropriately and responsibly.
We assess applied competence using a range of formative (continuous/ part of learning) and summative (final) assessment methods.
Articulation
The movement of learners between the different components of the education and training delivery system, while retaining credits for relevant, added knowledge and skills. Learner mobility refers to the ability of learners to move through the levels of the NQF, as well as across a range of providers, in a meaningful way by accumulating appropriate combinations of credits.
Assessment Criteria*
Each learning outcome must be demonstrable and therefore assessable. Assessment criteria lay down how much learning has to be evidenced, at what level of complexity and responsibility and how well. SAQA prefers assessment criteria to complete the stem: 'Evidence must show that learners ...': for instance, 'Evidence must show that learners use words according to standard dictionary definitions and the demands of context'.
Assessor
'... the person who is registered by the relevant Education and Training Quality Assurance [ETQA] body in accordance with criteria established for this purpose by a Standards Generating Body to measure the achievement of specified National Qualifications Framework standards and qualifications' (SAQA Regulations, March 1998). Higher education institutions are expected to use their academic staff as practitioner-assessors.
Assumption of learning already in place*
Learning can be formal prior accredited learning such as a senior certificate but it can also be informal learning such as language competence, experience in the field, numeracy skills, counselling experience, business experience at a particular level, etc.
C
Credits*
Value assigned by SAQA to ten notional hours of learning; for Unisa purposes, 120 notional hours per module, 12 credits. A three-year BA comprises 360 credits. These credits should represent a planned combination of compulsory core or fundamental credits as well as elective credits to help learners achieve the purpose of the qualification. At least 50% of the credits must be in the core category (Department of Education requirement).
D
Development
All activities designed to help employees gain knowledge, skills, attitudes or behaviour patterns required for future job performance (see Training).
E
Education and Training Quality Assurance Body (ETQA)
'... a body accredited by SAQA, responsible for monitoring and auditing achievement in terms of national standards and qualifications' (SAQA Regulations, March 1998). The Council on Higher Education (CHE) will be accredited by SAQA to act as the ETQA for higher education through a Higher Education Quality Committee (HEQC). Professional bodies such as the Nursing Council will also be licenced as ETQAs.
F
Fields/Learning Areas and Sub-fields
01 Agriculture and nature conservation (AN)
Biodiversity conservation, Land use planning, Soil and water
02 Culture and arts (CA)
Cultural studies, design studies, Graphic arts and printing (plus MET), Musicology, Performing arts, Sport, Visual arts
03 Business, commerce and management studies (BCM)
Administration (plus all 11 fields), Environmental management (plus AN and MET), finance (plus all 11 fields), Human resource management (plus all 11 fields), Management (plus all 11 fields), Marketing (plus all 11 fields), Public relations (plus all 11 fields), Trading (plus SERV)
04 Communication studies and language (CL)
Communication (plus all 11 fields), Information studies (plus all 11 fields), Information technology (plus all 11 fields), Languages (plus all 11 fields), Literature
05 Education, training and development (ETD)
Adult learning, early childhood development, Further education and training, General education and training, Higher education and training, Workplace ETD
06 Manufacturing, engineering and technology (MET)
All engineering fields, Mining, Transport
07 Human and social studies (HSS)
Citizenship and democracy, Environment and society, Individual development and socialization, International relations, Society and religion, Society in Space and time, Transformation and change
08 Law, military science and security (LMS)
Ensure a safe society, Ensure a just society, Safeguarding the sovereignty of the state
09 Health sciences and social services (HSSS)
Adult health, Child health and development, Community health, Education and training for health professionals, emergency services, Geriatrics, Health advisors/counsellors, Laboratory services and diagnostics, Maternal and reproductive health, Mental health, Military health, Occupational health, Oral health, Social health and services, Special senses, Sports medicine
10 Physical, maths, computer and life sciences (PMCL)
Computer science (plus all 11 fields), Earth sciences, Life sciences, Mathematical sciences, Physical sciences
11 Services (SERV)
Hospitality, tourism, leisure and travel, Retail and wholesale
12 Physical planning and construction (PPC)
I
Integrated assessment
Any assessment that expects students to integrate knowledge and skills learnt in order to produce a specified result is integrated assessment. In many ways final examinations are integrated assessment as are theses, practical work in teaching, nursing, counselling, etc. In SAQA terms, integrated assessment
* gives meaning to a qualification (purpose);
* permits a demonstration of competencies (application);
* uses multiple assessment instruments (diversity).
L
Level Descriptors*
'Level' refers to level on the NQF. Levels 5 to 8 fall into the higher education and training (HET) band. Level 4 means that a senior certificate or matriculation exemption is not an entry requirement. Level 5 requires a senior certificate or matriculation exemption. Level 6 requires matriculation exemption and some Level 5 credits. Level 7 is generally postgraduate. Level descriptors try to identify the level of complexity and responsibility of learning at each level as a guideline for academics developing standards.
Lifelong Learning
Ongoing learning through a continuous, supportive process that stimulates and empowers individuals to acquire and apply the knowledge, values, skills and critical understanding, required to respond confidently and creatively and rise to the challenges of a changing social, political and economic environment.
M
Master's degrees
A Master's degree (a minimum of 120 NQF credits) may be by dissertation only or it may be structured. A structured Master's may comprise course work only or a combination of course work and a dissertation of limited scope. In order to qualify for NRF funding, the dissertation must comprise 50% of the degree. An integrated Master's degree combines the Honours with the Master's programme, with the Honours as an exit level after at least 120 NQF credits.
Module
A unit of teaching and learning activity expressed as an approximate number of hours of study. It is self-contained although certain combinations of modules may represent a progression through the curriculum. A module is a coherent, self-contained unit of learning, designed to achieve a set of specific learning outcomes which are assessed within that unit of learning. For the purpose of articulation within Unisa, all modules must be multiples of 12 credits (120 hours). Each year of study (first, second or third year) will comprise ten modules (120 credits). Each module of 12 credits counts 0,1 in terms of subsidy, so ten modules equal 1 subsidy point per year of study. Modules combine in a planned way to form learning programmes with specific purposes and outcomes. Learning programmes lead to the awarding of a qualification such as a degree. A three-year degree counts 360 NQF credits. Modules may be offered in semesters or across a whole year, as determined by specific faculties.
A module that may be taken by any student in order to fill up his or her degree curriculum to the required number of modules. Modules which have a code 80 may be taken on any level while those with a code 82 may only be taken on second or third year level.
A programme-specific module taken concurrently with the final year of study. The purpose of such a module is to integrate deliberately the learning that has taken place throughout the programme to assess if the exit outcomes have been achieved.
N
National Standards Bodies (NSB)
National stakeholders comprising six key interest groups in the field, six per group (e.g. education, industry, labour etc.). An NSB recommends a framework of fields and sub-fields. It also recommends standards for registration on the NQF.
National Qualifications Framework (NQF)
The NQF is structured into three Bands:
- a formal and informal primary and secondary education Band for children and adults (Level 1), leading to General Education and Training certificates [GETC] up to Grade 9;
- a Further Education and Training Band (Levels 2 to 4) that is post-compulsory and pre-tertiary at schools and colleges as well as through private sector programmes [FETC], and
- a Higher Education and Training Band (Levels 5 to 8), which is concerned with tertiary education mainly at universities, technikons and professional colleges but also includes private sector courses.
Learners have to accumulate credits for unit standards in order to show competence at a particular level and proceed to the next level. At school level there will be five phases: preschool, grades 1 - 3, Grades 4 and 5, Grades 6 and 7, and Grades 8 and 9. Teachers will earn a National Teachers' Diploma at Level 5. A Bachelor's degree from a university would be at Level 6 and a doctorate would be at Level 8.
The aims of the NQF are as follows:
(a) create an integrated national framework for learning achievements;
(b) facilitate access to, and mobility and progression within, education and training;
(c) enhance the quality of education and training.
(d) accelerate the redress of past unfair discrimination in education, training and employment opportunities, and thereby
(e) contribute to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of the nation at large.
Norms and Standards for Educators
The Minister of Education has approved a document laying down the norms and standards for teacher education. In the document seven roles of the teacher are specified:
- Mediator of learning
- Interpreter and designer of learning programmes and materials
- Leader, manager and administrator
- Scholar, researcher and lifelong learner
- Community, citizenship and pastoral role
- Assessor
- Learning area/ subject/ discipline/ phase specialist
Notional hours of learning
A notional hour relates to the time it would take an average learner to meet the outcomes defined. It includes concepts such as contact time, time spent in structured learning in the workplace and individual learning. 1 SAQA credit equals ten notional hours of learning. A module of 120 hours would be 12 SAQA credits. At Unisa we need to calculate time spent reading guides, doing self-assessment in guides, doing research for assignments, writing assignments, attending tutorials/ workshops, etc., revising for exams and actually writing exams.
O
Outcomes*(2)
Outcomes are what you can do and what you understand, the contextually demonstrated end-products of the learning process. Outcomes are the results of learning processes - knowledge, skills, attitudes and values - within a particular context so that knowledge is applied, skills develop into competencies and attitudes and values harmonize with those of the workplace. An outcome is only an outcome if it can be demonstrated and measured. SAQA prefers outcomes to be expressed as 'Learners can ...'; for example, 'Learners can solve problems responsibly and creatively'.
- Critical cross-field education and training outcomes
General things you can do and understand, like communicating and problem-solving, which inform all areas of learning. These are sometimes known as generic competencies or fundamental abilities. These outcomes are the minimum requirements to be met by all programmes/ qualifications. They may be added to by specific institutions. While whole qualifications have to meet all the outcomes, individual modules that comprise a qualification may meet one or more of the outcomes.
Critical Outcomes for education at all levels as laid down by the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA Decision 0204/96)
- Identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made.
- Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organization, community.
- Organize and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively.
- Collect, analyse, organize and critically evaluate information.
- Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and / or language skills in the modes of oral and / or written presentation.
- Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environments and health of others.
- Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognizing that problem solving contexts do not exist in isolation.
In order to contribute to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of the society at large, it must be the intention underlying any programme of learning to make an individual aware of the importance of:
- Reflecting on and exploring a variety of strategies to learn more effectively;
- Participating as responsible citizens in the life of local, national and global communities;
- Being culturally and aesthetically sensitive across a range of social contexts;
- Exploring education and career opportunities, and
- Developing entrepreneurial opportunities.
|
Special skills, knowledge and understanding in a particular context, like job or school subject or broader. In order to arrive at these specific outcomes, designers of programmes or modules need to unpack the critical outcomes in relation to their own disciplines. For instance, in the Communication Studies and Language field, the following specific outcomes were identified for the GET and FET bands:
- Learners make and negotiate meaning.
- Learners show critical awareness of language usage.
- Learners respond to the aesthetic, affective, cultural and social values in texts.
- Learners access, process and use information from a variety of sources and situations.
- Learners understand, know and apply language structures and conventions in context.
- Learners use language for learning.
- Learners use appropriate communication strategies for specific purposes and situations.
|
These specific outcomes can be further particularized in the traditional language skills areas such as listening, speaking, reading and writing.
- Exit level outcomes of significance
The outcomes 'to be achieved by a qualifying learner at the point at which he or she leaves the programme leading to a qualification' (SAQA Regulations, March 1998).
- Learning outcomes, specific outcomes and critical outcomes*
For Unisa purposes, different terms will be applied to different levels of outcomes to avoid confusion:
| Module level: |
learning outcomes |
| Qualification level: |
specific outcomes |
| SAQA/ NQF level: |
critical outcomes |
P
Portability
The condition of transferability and recognition of credits between programmes, providers and employers.
Programme
Any course of study that leads to an approved tertiary qualification registered with the NQF. It need not have an overt vocational purpose but it must prepare students for participation in society and the economy. Programmes should contain a matrix of fundamental ('that which forms the grounding or basis needed to undertake the ... learning required in obtaining the qualification': in essence literacy and numeracy skills, according to SAQA), core ('compulsory learning required in situations contextually relevant to the particular qualification') and elective ('enable learners to pursue some of their own learning interests' and to achieve the purpose of the qualification) learning. (See the Addendum under 'Credits' for further notes on the concepts of core, fundamental and elective credits.) A programme is a purposeful and structured set of learning experiences designed to enable learners to achieve pre-specified exit level outcomes. It is the purpose of the programme which gives rise to its learning outcomes and structure. A programme is therefore defined as a coherent combination of units of learning (modules) expressed in an outcomes-based format which leads to one or more qualifications, which serve an academic and/ or vocational purpose.
Q
Qualification
In outcomes-based education, a qualification is the certification of the attainment of the learning outcomes of a coherent learning programme expressed as an accumulation of credits at specified levels, (with rules of access and rules of combination). A BA, for instance, is a qualification. A qualification represents the demonstrated achievement by a learner of a planned and purposeful combination of learning outcomes 'which is intended to provide qualifying learners with applied competence and a basis for further learning' (National Standards Bodies Regulations, 1998).
The qualification should enrich the learner by providing her or him with marketable skills so that she or he can contribute to society. It should provide professional and skilled people. It should enhance access, mobility and professionalism. It should provide quality.
R
Range Statement*
A statement which informs an assessor of the level of complexity of learning expected in relation to an outcome or set of outcomes, the amount of responsibility the learner must evidence and the context in which the demonstration of learning must take place. It helps if you avoid the words 'Learners can' when writing range statements. Instead, use statements which start: 'The context is' or a sentence like 'Learners apply theory to practice in the context of problem situations in their day-to-day work environment'.
Recognition of Prior Learning
Legislation stipulates that tertiary qualifications 'may be achieved in whole or in part through the recognition of prior learning, which concept includes but is not limited to learning outcomes achieved through formal, informal and non-formal learning and work experience'. (SAQA Regulations, 28 March 1998, p. 9). The Act also defines the concept 'recognition of prior learning' as 'the comparison of the previous learning and experience of a learner howsoever obtained against the learning outcomes required for a specified qualification, and the acceptance for purposes of qualification of that which meets the requirements' (ibid: 5). RPL has two aspects: the transfer of credits for formal learning and the assessment and accreditation of experiential learning. The transfer of credits relates to the portability of credits between higher education institutions. Credit transfer between various types of HE institution for the purposes of articulation and portability will lead to a seamless HE sector. It should be noted that relevant learning derived from experience may qualify the prospective student for access to a qualification or to advanced placement within a qualification.
Rules of Combination
The specified regulations stipulating the minimum requirements for the manner isn which various unit standards that lead to a qualification should be combined.
S
SAQA Guidelines for Submission of Qualifications
Whole Qualification Format:
- name of qualification;
- a statement of the purpose of the qualification;
- assumptions of learning already in place before the programme leading to the qualification is commenced;
- exit level outcomes as contemplated in regulation 5(1)(b) and (c) and the associated assessment criteria;
- total credits required;
- minimum credits required at specific levels or maximum credits when these exceed the minima specified in regulation 8 or 9;
- integrated assessment appropriately incorporated to ensure that the purpose of the qualification is achieved;
- articulation possibilities with related qualifications (either generic or specific arrangements for articulation);
- criteria for registration of assessors;
- moderation options including the recommendations of a moderating body or bodies
Unit Standard Format
- Unit Standard title
- SAQA approved logo
- Unit Standard number
- Unit Standard level on the NQF
- Credits attached to the Unit Standard
- Field and sub-field of the Unit Standard
- Issue date
- Review date
- Purpose of the Unit Standard
- Learning assumed to be in place before this Unit Standard is commenced
- Specific outcomes
- Assessment criteria
- Accreditation process (including moderation) for the Unit Standard
- Range statements
- Notes
15.1 Critical cross-field outcomes
15.2 Essential embedded knowledge
15.3 Supplementary information
SETA
A SETA is a sectoral education and training authority. Various economic sectors will set up SETAs which will have functions in relation to standards generation and quality assurance. They will be funded by the Skills Development Levy and form part of the system for the repayment of part of the levy to employers.
Standard
A statement of (predetermined) defined educational and training outcomes: what is taught (content), how much (the expected level of achievement of the learners) and purpose. It is essentially an assessor's document which says what learners must know and be able to do, what evidence they must produce to show the learning and how that evidence will be assessed (assessment criteria). SAQA allows both unit standards and qualification standards.
Standards Generating Bodies (SGB)
Key education and training stakeholders in a sub-field, drawn from interest groups and specialists. They will generate unit standards and qualifications. A single provider may initiate an SGB comprising mainly its own staff and some key stakeholders in order to generate the standard while at the same time developing the curriculum internally.
T
Training
All activities to help learners gain knowledge, skills, attitudes or behaviour patterns that would improve their performance in current jobs so that organizational objectives may be achieved
- Transfer of Training: the expectation that a person will apply the knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired during training in his/ her job
- Trainer/ Instructor: the person responsible for instruction and group facilitation within the training process who presents information and directs structured learning so that people learn and group members recognise a positive learning experience
- On-the-job-training: training employees on the job, meaning they work, learn and develop expertise as part of the performance management process through day-to-day contacts, achieving specific learning objectives
U
Unit standards*
Statements of what specific outcomes should be achieved in a particular unit of learning and how they may be assessed. The unit standard would include performance outcomes, a description of the knowledge to be gained and assessment criteria including both what learners should be able to show at the end of a learning period and act as a guide to the assessor as to the levels of knowledge, performance and understanding the learner is expected to achieve. These unit standards would combine into a learning programme following certain rules of combination. For university purposes, a unit standard may be equated with a module of 12 credits and thus the equivalent of one hundred and twenty notional hours of work.
ADDENDUM
Assessment Criteria
The following information on assessment criteria comes from Roy Killen (2000):
When learners attempt to demonstrate that they have achieved a particular outcome, they may be successful or they may not - you have to be able to judge the quality of their performance and decide whether it is good enough. So that your judgements are rational, you must have criteria by which to judge the learners' performances - these are called assessment criteria. They describe what you want to see in learners' performance before you accept it as sufficient evidence that the outcome has been achieved.
For example, if the outcome is that 'Learners can communicate effectively', you will need criteria that address such things as the vocabulary and grammar that the learners use. You will have to decide whether you want learners to use 'correct' grammar or 'appropriate' grammar, and what the difference is between 'correct' and 'appropriate' grammar. The more precise you can be with your assessment criteria, the easier it will be for you to decide whether the learner has achieved the outcome.
To develop assessment criteria, ask yourself questions such as:
'How will I determine whether the learner has achieved the outcome to a satisfactory standard?'
'What really makes the difference between acceptable and unacceptable performance of the outcome?'
Assessment criteria should be written as statements beginning with a phrase such as:
'Evidence generated through appropriate assessment tasks must show that ..."
"Student performance will be judged by ...'
For example: 'Evidence must show that learners use vocabulary appropriate to the communications context'.
You should try to describe the assessment criteria as clearly as possible. To do this, you might need to include phrases such as:
'following standard safety precautions'
'under close supervision'
'within complex and unpredictable contexts'
'at highly abstract levels'
'using readily available information'.
To decide what statements you need to include in the assessment criteria, you will need to think about the best way to describe competence in your specialist field. You also have to decide what level of competence is appropriate (and a realistic expectation) for your learners.
Do not forget that your assessment criteria must make sense to the learners and they must lead you to using assessment methods (examinations, projects, etc.) that are valid, reliable and fair.
Assumptions of learning already in place
The following information comes from Roy Killen (2000):
If learners are to be successful in a unit of study (i.e., if they are to have any chance of achieving the Specific Outcomes), they will need certain knowledge, skills and dispositions before they start the unit. There are two reasons why it is important for you to have a clear idea of what these necessary prerequisites are: (1) If you do not know, then you cannot make a sensible decision about where to start with your teaching so that you can help learners build on their prior knowledge; and (2) If you do not know then you cannot tell learners - so they might assume quite incorrectly that they have the required prerequisites.
Your statement of assumed learning should address specifically the significant knowledge, skills and dispositions that learners will need if they are to be successful in the module. It is not very useful to simply say that learners require matriculation or matriculation with a certain level in specific subjects, or that they have 'experience in a relevant field'. The problem is that these general entry requirements (such as matriculation) do not necessarily indicate that particular learners have the necessary prerequisites. It is much more useful, for both lectures and learners, to identify the key concepts that learners should understand and the key skills that they will need in order to start developing new knowledge and skills in the unit.
It is useful to think of the learners' prior knowledge and skills as 'building blocks' that will provide the foundation for further learning. If some of these buildings blocks are missing, this may seriously inhibit the learners' chances of ever achieving the outcomes.
The important thing is that learners have the prerequisites, where they got them (formal or informal learning) is irrelevant.
Credits: Core, Fundamental and Elective
'Core' learning credits are compulsory in situations contextually relevant to the particular qualification. Typically:
- theoretical knowledge related to the field of the qualification at the appropriate level
- related context of the qualification, e.g. the economy, structures of work, environmental issues
- practical applications of the theory in the field of the qualification
'Fundamental' learning credits form the grounding or basis needed to undertake the education, training or further learning required in obtaining a qualification. Typically:
- communication and language outcomes / competencies
- use of mathematical, technological and life-science related outcomes / competencies
- use of 'critical outcome' abilities
- use of 'life skills', e.g. ability to learn
'Elective' learning credits are selected additional credits at the level of the NQF specified, to ensure that the purpose(s) of the qualification is (are) achieved. Here the idea of specialization can also be brought in:
- outcomes / competencies related to specialized areas that may or may not be at a more complex level
- outcomes / competencies that broaden the core by providing other career / occupational directions
(Green paper on FET, April 1998, page 39)
Level Descriptors(3)
The following is the latest draft set of descriptors from a SAUVCA task group (Luckett &Kilfoil 2000):
NQF level &
pegging of
qualifications |
Level Descriptors
Evidence shows that the learner can: |
8b
PhD, Senior Doctorates |
Foundational Competence:
Demonstrate a depth of knowledge and high levels of theoretical understanding in a complex and specialized area/ across specialized or applied areas; question existing knowledge boundaries and practices; extend the frontiers of knowledge; apply knowledge and theory to unfamiliar, unpredictable contexts; deal with complexity, lacunae and contradictions in the knowledge base; show mastery of the literature in a field; comprehend and live with paradox.
Practical Competence:
Demonstrate intellectual independence, apply sophisticated knowledge and research methodologies for the solution of complex, unfamiliar problems; autonomously synthesize and evaluate information; make sound evaluations on the basis of independently generated criteria; create responses to problems that expand or redefine existing knowledge; operate successfully in unfamiliar situations and confidently select tools for the job; design and manage abstract systems models.
Reflexive Competence:
Independently produce a thesis, or significant body of published work, that places research within the broader context of the field and which withstands international expert intellectual scrutiny and contributes to original knowledge in the field; engage in full professional communication with others in the field; demonstrate research leadership within a field or across disciplines; manage risk-taking ventures in a research domain; accurately assess, with justification, own and others' work; work confidently in unfamiliar, unpredictable contexts; demonstrate high levels of responsibility, self-reflexivity and adaptability; practise within academic, professional and/or self-defined ethics. |
8a
Masters by Research, Masters by Course work |
Foundational Competence:
Demonstrate mastery of theoretically sophisticated subject matter within a deep and comprehensive knowledge of a field or specialized area; demonstrate mastery of theory and its application to a specialized field; critically evaluate the literature of the field; challenge orthodox theory and redefine existing knowledge; demonstrate an awareness of the constructed and provisional nature of knowledge; handle contradictions and make value commitments.
Practical Competence:
Confidently use well-developed research skills; demonstrate mastery of research techniques in a specialized field; independently analyze and evaluate new data and situations using a wide range of techniques/ methods appropriately; extrapolate implications beyond given data; use high order principles to relate data to new, broader issues; transform abstract data and concepts for a given purpose; critically and independently review evidence which supports conclusions; identify and define complex problems and apply appropriate knowledge, skills and research methods for their solution; manipulate abstract systems models.
Reflexive Competence:
Demonstrate capacity for independent study through completion of a dissertation or report (if a research Masters, this should meet criteria for publication with expert assistance); plan and manage work in specialised and unpredictable contexts; effectively interact and engage in debate with a learning or professional group; critically evaluate own and others' work with justification; demonstrate appropriate academic and professional values; take calculated risks; demonstrate responsibility, self-reflexivity and adaptability; demonstrate awareness of ethical dilemmas in professional practice. |
7
Honours, PG Diploma, Professional Bachelors |
Foundational Competence:
Articulate comprehensive, systematic and deep knowledge of area of specialisation and awareness of variety of contexts in which it may apply; undertake progressive study of the literature of a given field; communicate an understanding of the principles and concepts underpinning the field of study and an understanding of its boundaries and limitations; make sound theoretical judgements and evaluations based on evidence; think epistemologically, i.e. evaluate the foundations of thought and knowledge; accept the provisional nature of knowledge, relativity and understand that some positions are more valid than others within a given frame of reference.
Practical Competence:
Communicate effectively in a form appropriate to the profession or discipline; analyse, reformat, synthesise and evaluate a wide range of new information without guidance; transform abstract data and concepts for a given purpose; demonstrate critical and evaluative argumentative skills; demonstrate practical skills and techniques required to apply knowledge in a professional context; understand basic research methods; use appropriate methods for the defining and solving of problems within a discipline; justify and explain conclusions within the epistemology of one discipline; solve problems in unfamiliar contexts; relate theory to practice and vice versa; recognise hierarchies in systemic relationships and analyse organisational principles underpinning a system.
Reflexive Competence:
Demonstrate capacity for independent study within broad guidelines via completion of a paper or project report (not expected to meet criteria for publication, but showing potential for this); demonstrate professional working relationships within the discipline or profession; judge own performance on basis of own criteria; reflect on action and use feedback constructively; work confidently in unfamiliar contexts; demonstrate awareness of personal responsibility and ethical dimensions of own work. |
6
Bachelors Degree,
Undergraduate Diplomas |
Foundational Competence:
Demonstrate a broad knowledge base with some depth in one or more areas; demonstrate a sound knowledge of classification systems and processes within at least one discipline; conduct systematic inquiry into the theory and practice of at least one discipline; map new knowledge onto a coherent understanding of the discipline or field, using theories of the discipline; analyse and evaluate data, ideas, theories and practices within a given discipline.
Practical Competence:
Use a range of study methods confidently; comprehend and analyse new information, concepts and evidence from a range of sources within a given domain; reformat information for a given purpose; express own opinion clearly; use information selectively to justify a position or viewpoint and present this logically and systematically in a variety of prescribed formats; use discipline-specific conventions appropriately; report practical procedures clearly and precisely; identify key elements and solve concrete and abstract problems using appropriate methods and theories of a discipline; analyse the elements and understand the relationships of a system and its general principles.
Reflexive Competence:
Use self-directed learning strategies; accurately evaluate own learning against given criteria and take responsibility for what still needs to be learnt; begin to develop own criteria and judgements; apply knowledge and skills to non-routine contexts; effectively interact in a learning group; show awareness of wider social and ethical applications of area of study. |
5
Undergraduate Certificates, Foundation Programmes |
Foundational Competence:
Demonstrate a fundamental knowledge base using appropriate terminology; understand the ground rules and some theoretical concepts in a discipline or field; analyse and synthesise information with guidance using given classifications and principles, but not necessarily integrating or evaluating it within a broader frame of reference; accept a multiplicity of 'right answers'.
Practical Competence:
Demonstrate essential study skills and basic information processing skills, (e.g. read, understand and take notes from set academic texts; use a library and retrieve information at a general level of competence; select, summarise and report information appropriately and accurately in a predicable, standard format; organise and present information in summaries, report and essays; appropriately use conventions and formulae of academic discourse); plan and implement basic procedures and experiments; apply tools, methods and specific principles to standard problems and propose solutions to well-defined problems; carry out routine procedures, develop an occupationally-focused skills' base; recognise relevant elements in a system, but not necessarily understand their systemic relations.
Reflexive Competence:
Display self-confidence in the new intellectual and social context of learning; begin to recognise own strengths and weaknesses against given criteria; begin to reflect on own learning practice and engage in meta-cognition; meet obligations to others; begin to hold own opinions and values; demonstrate limited autonomy within defined guidelines, although most learning is still directed by others. |
Outcomes
The following information comes from Roy Killen (2000):
An outcome is a statement of what learners should be able to do as a result of engaging in the subject/module/unit. For example, 'Learners can interpret financial statements' or 'Learners can communicate effectively using spoken and written English'.
In general, it is more useful to have outcomes that indicate what learners will be able to do with their knowledge rather than outcomes that simply indicate that learners will acquire knowledge. You might find it easier to first think about the knowledge you want learners to acquire and then think about what you want learners to be able to do with that knowledge. For example, you might start with a statement such as 'Learners can understand the Value Added Tax Act' and then reword it to something like 'Learners can interpret and apply the Value Added Tax Act'. You would also need to think about why you wanted learners to be able to interpret this Act and what they would actually be doing when they applied it. This will help you to develop assessment criteria and range statements.
To develop an outcome, ask yourself these question:
'What do I want the learners to be able to do as a result of my teaching?'
'How can I tell the difference between a learner who has achieved this outcome and a learner who has not achieved this outcome?'
Sometimes it is easier to write outcomes if you start by thinking about what you want learners to 'be' rather than what you want them to 'do'. For example, you might start by thinking that you want learners to be 'effective communicators'; then you could ask yourself 'What sorts of things can effective communicators do?' You might then find it useful to write outcomes in the format: 'Learners will be effective communicators who can use appropriate vocabulary, write fluently, ...'. If you think about outcomes in this way, you are half way to developing your assessment criteria.
Learning outcomes, specific outcomes and critical outcomes
Each module should have between two and six learning outcomes. Each outcome should have one range statement, at least two assessment criteria and at most about five to ten, the specific qualification outcome(s) which it supports and the critical outcome(s) which it supports. This format would be in line with the format used for the recording of short courses (unit standards) with SAQA. The format would look as follows (LSK011-9: Language and Learning Skills is used as an example):
Learning Outcome |
| 1 Learners can communicate effectively using spoken and written English that is appropriate for university study. |
| Range statement: Language and communication skills will be demonstrated in contexts typical of the demands of first-year undergraduate study. |
Assessment Criteria |
1 use grammar with sufficient accuracy to facilitate communication.
2 use reference books, such as dictionaries, with confidence and accuracy.
3 use vocabulary appropriate for the communications context and convey the meaning intended.
4 use words accurately according to standard dictionary definitions.
5 apply appropriate reading strategies to comprehend accurately and have insight into the writers' intention.
6 write fluently, appropriately and are easily understood by the intended audience.
7 edit and rewrite to produce clear, accurate copy that achieves its purpose.
8 respond appropriately to verbal or written interaction because they listen and read carefully.
9 achieve understanding, resolution of issues and identifiable learning through oral and/ or written communication. |
Qualification Outcome(s) |
| The BA graduate can demonstrate academic literacy. |
Critical Outcome(s) |
- communicating effectively using language skills in a written medium to complete reading and writing tasks in the study guide, assignments and examinations;
- reflecting on and exploring a variety of strategies to learn more effectively;
- analysing, organizing and critically evaluating information in the study guide and other written/ spoken texts;
- organizing and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively in order to cope with one's studies;
|
Learning Outcome |
| 2 Learners can take responsibility for and manage their own learning during at least the first year of undergraduate study. |
| Range statement: With guidance, learners will develop the ability to take full responsibility for their learning and for the quality and quantity of the products that they produce as a learner. |
Assessment Criteria |
1 identify needs that lead to learning success.
2 set priorities and goals appropriate to achieving success at tertiary study.
3 evaluate themselves honestly.
4 progress at an appropriate pace.
5 respond to learning difficulties based on an internal locus of control.
6 identify concrete learning problems accurately and explore multiple solutions.
7 integrate new knowledge purposefully with existing knowledge. |
Qualification Outcome(s) |
| The BA graduate can demonstrate academic literacy. |
Critical Outcome(s) |
- reflecting on and exploring a variety of strategies to learn more effectively;
- analysing, organizing and critically evaluating information in the study guide and other written/ spoken texts;
- organizing and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively in order to cope with one's studies;
- demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems.
- exploring education opportunities through an awareness of one's own skills and their value.
|
Range Statements
According to the level descriptors put out by SAQA, Level 5 should use words like 'given knowledge base', 'predictable', 'standard', 'under tutor guidance', 'well-defined problems', 'accurate'; Level 6 should use words like 'detailed knowledge', 'variety of contexts', 'basic research', 'appropriate methods', 'limited guidance'. It is not advisable in Level 4 and 5 programmes to use range statements that include words like 'advanced'; 'basic' is preferable. Even 'in-depth' is only appropriate when the context is the self or a clearly delimited single field of study. The same range statements may apply to all outcomes or you may use different range statements for different outcomes.
The following guidelines come from Alice Goodwin-Davey (2000): Complexity means what level of complexity learners should achieve as minimum to pass. Level 4 should be different range than Level 5, Level 6, etc. You could say at a level "appropriate for first year undergraduate study", etc. A term such as 'basic' could also describe complexity as could terms such as 'broad understanding', 'narrow focus', 'in-depth knowledge' etc. Words like 'correctly', or 'with sufficient accuracy' are also useful. Responsibility means how much guidance you, as lecturer, provide and how independently the learners work. Level 5 is 'with lecturer guidance', 'in collaboration with others' and 'responsible for own output'; Level 6 is 'with limited guidance', 'in collaboration with others, possibly as group leader' and 'responsible for own output and in a limited/ defined way for the output of others' and Levels 7 and 8 should require independent work, leadership etc. Context means the type of learning expected: for example, from selected texts, from authentic source texts of the profession, case studies, community work, etc. (NOTE that 'contexts' does NOT mean a syllabus list of contents/ topics or a list of assignment/ exam questions.) It could also be a small business, a group, an everyday work situation, etc.
The following information on range statements comes from Roy Killen (2000):
A range statement describes the scope and complexity of the context and contexts with which the learners should engage in order to reach an acceptable level of achievement of a particular outcome. It defines the limits of the Unit Standard (or of a Specific Outcome). These limits need to describe the level of content that students must understand and the range of circumstances in which they must demonstrate the knowledge, skills and dispositions that they have acquired.
To develop a range statement, ask yourself questions such as:
'What content will the learners be dealing with as they demonstrate the outcome?'
'In what context will the outcome be demonstrated?'
Unit Standards
The following is an example of a unit standard taken from the HSRC publication on the NQF:
| unit standard |
| SAQA |
Generating Reports |
NSB
Logo ID/Logo |
Unit number: E456
Level: NQF Level 4
Credit: 4 |
Field: Communication Science and Languages
Issue Date: 1 October 1995
Expiry Date: 31 December 1995 |
Capability:
A candidate at this level is capable of generating reports. |
Entry Assumptions:
(a) Language Communications:
and
(b) Mathematics: |
LCOM2 (Fundamental category, pre GEC)MATH2
(Fundamental category, pre GEC) |
Performance Outcomes:
1 Collect, organize and analyse information
2 Generate written reports |
Assessment Criteria:
1.1 Information is gathered from predictable and easily available sources.
1.2 Faulty information is identified, sources are established and rectified within a known range.
1.3 Information is analysed and organized in a way which is consistent with the purpose.
1.4 Conclusions are drawn which are consistent with the information.
1.5 Recommendations are generated when requested.
2.1 Information is presented using the required format and terminology.
2.2 Reports are presented on time.
2.3 Special purpose reports are presented to communicate problems and make recommendations where problems are of a predictable nature.
2.4 Reports are acceptable to the writer and the recipient. |
Underpinning Knowledge:
Capable performers need to know:
i required format of routine reports;
ii range of report purposes and associated requirements;
iii range of audiences for whom reports may need to be written;
iv range of ways of presenting data, e.g. charts, lists, graphs, etc.
v reasons why accurate and timeous reports are needed in this context.
|
Range Statements:
Report is used to denote any required written communication that goes beyond a simple recording of facts (such as completion of a pro forma shift production schedule) to include a level of analysis and/or research. Simple analysis and research would be required using readily or easily available information. |
Moderation:
This unit could be moderated by the Communications National Standards Body nominee. |
The following is an example of the access module Language and Learning Skills (LSK011-9) written up as a unit standard (see alternative format for the table under the addendum on 'outcomes':
- Unit Standard title
Language and Learning Skills
- SAQA approved logo
- Unit Standard number
- Unit Standard level on the NQF
4
- Credits attached to the Unit Standard
12
-
Student Activity
Initial Reading of Study Guide
Doing tasks in Study Guide
Initial listening to tapes
Initial consultation of prescribed books
Writing assignments
Revision for exams
Writing exams
Total |
Notional hours for whole unit standard
30
35
3
20
10
20
2
120
|
- Field and sub-field of the Unit Standard
04 Communication studies and Language and all other fields
Sub-field: Language
- Issue date
- Review date
- Purpose of the Unit Standard
The purpose of this unit standard is to equip learners with the language and learning skills that are necessary for success in the first year of undergraduate study.
- Learning assumed to be in place before this Unit Standard is commenced
* Intermediate-level grasp of English (not for beginners; advanced students could ask for RPL)
* Capable of learning from predominantly written material
* Willingness to take responsibility for own progress
| 11 Specific outcomes |
12 Assessment Criteria
Evidence in the form of tasks in study materials, written (and, in some cases, oral) assignments, portfolio tasks, projects, case studies and examinations, must show that learners |
14 Range Statements |
| 1 Learners can communicate effectively using spoken and written English that is appropriate for university study. |
- use grammar with sufficient accuracy to facilitate communication.
- use reference books, such as dictionaries, with confidence and accuracy.
- use vocabulary appropriate for the communications context and convey the meaning intended.
- use words accurately according to standard dictionary definitions.
- apply appropriate reading strategies to comprehend accurately and have insight into the writers' intention.
- write fluently, appropriately and are easily understood by the intended audience.
- edit and rewrite to produce clear, accurate copy that achieves its purpose.
- respond appropriately to verbal or written interaction because they listen and read carefully.
- achieve understanding, resolution of issues and identifiable learning through oral and/ or written communication.
|
The language and learning skills are those that are necessary for success in the first-year of an undergraduate degree course.
With guidance, learners will develop the ability to take full responsibility for their learning and for the quality and quantity of the products that they produce as a learner.
Language and communication skills will be demonstrated in contexts typical of the demands of first-year undergraduate study. |
| 2 Learners can take responsibility for and manage their own learning during at least the first year of undergraduate study. |
- identify needs that lead to learning success.
- set priorities and goals appropriate to achieving success at tertiary study.
- evaluate themselves honestly.
- progress at an appropriate pace.
- respond to learning difficulties based on an internal locus of control.
- identify concrete learning problems accurately and explore multiple solutions.
- integrate new knowledge purposefully with existing knowledge.
|
As above.
Learners should display an in-depth knowledge of themselves in the following areas: interests, experience, knowledge, skills (general and language-specific), attitudes, short and long term goals. |
13 Accreditation process (including moderation) for the Unit Standard
All higher education is accredited through the CHE. The Unit Standard will also be submitted to the NSB for Field 04: Communication Studies and Language.
15 Notes
15.1 Critical cross-field outcomes
LSK011-9 directly addresses the following SAQA cross-field critical outcomes:
- communicating effectively using language skills in a written medium to complete reading and writing tasks in the study guide, assignments and examinations;
- reflecting on and exploring a variety of strategies to learn more effectively;
- analysing, organizing and critically evaluating information in the study guide and other written/ spoken texts;
- organizing and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively in order to cope with one's studies;
- demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognizing that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation through engaging in a number of tasks which require integration of information from different sources and from existing knowledge;
- exploring education and career opportunities through an awareness of one's own skills and their value.
15.2 Essential embedded knowledge (Not applicable to LSK; skills course)
Learners can understand and explain ...
Learners can apply ...
15.3 Supplementary information (Not applicable to LSK)
Sources:
Cosser, M. 1998. A Draft Framework for Qualifications in the Higher Education and Training Band of the National Qualifications Framework. A working paper.
Goodwin-Davey, A. 1999/2000. Notes from training sessions on developing outcomes-based standards and assessment criteria.
HSRC. 1995. Understanding the NQF.
Kilfoil, W. R. 1998/1999/2000. Unit standard on LSK011-9; and notes developed to assist academic staff in completing SAQA documentation.
Killen, R. 2000. Notes from training sessions on developing unit standards.
Luckett, K. 1997. Programmes Hand-book: Guidelines for Programme Design, Specification, Approval and Registration at the University of Natal. Durban: University of Natal.
Luckett, K. and Kilfoil, W. R. 2000. A SAUVCA Position on Level Descriptors for the HET Band & the Mapping of HE Qualifications to NQF Levels (Draft).
South African Qualifications Authority Act, Act 58 of 1995.
South African Qualifications Authority. 1997. Bulletin, 1:1, May/June.
South African Qualifications Authority. 1997. Bulletin, 2:2, November/December.
South African Qualifications Authority. 1998. Regulations under the South African Qualifications Authority Act of 1995. Pretoria: Government Gazette, 28 March 1998.
South African Qualifications Authority. 1998. Notice 1252 of 1998. National Standards Bodies' Framework of Sub-Fields. Pretoria: Government Gazette, 3 July 1998.
Unisa Staff Training and Development Policy |